Annotated Bibliography on Analysis
§5: Modern Conceptions of Analysis, outside Analytic Philosophy

This bibliography is intended as a reference guide to the key works that deal, in whole or in part, with analysis and related topics such as analyticity and definition. Cross-references are by name(s) of author(s) or editor(s) and either year of publication or abbreviation as indicated immediately after their name(s). Notes in square brackets at the end of an entry indicate the relevant part(s) of the work and/or its significance to the topic of analysis. Key passages can be found quoted in the supplementary document on Definitions and Descriptions of Analysis, linked from the relevant entry and note by means of ‘{Quotation(s)}’. In some cases where there is material available online, an internet address is also given after the entry.

This section of the bibliography corresponds to Section 5 of the main entry, and is divided into subsections which will correspond to the subsections of the supplementary document on Modern Conceptions of Analysis, outside Analytic Philosophy, with the exception of the introduction and conclusion. Where works include important material under more than one heading, they are cited under each heading; but duplication has been kept to a minimum. Cross-references to other (sub)sections are provided in curly brackets.

• 5.1 General
• 5.2 German Idealism and Romanticism
• 5.3 Bernard Bolzano and the Central European Tradition
• 5.4 Neo-Kantianism
• 5.5 Scientific Philosophy
• 5.6 British Empiricism and Idealism
• 5.7 American Pragmatism
• 5.8 Phenomenology
• 5.9 Indian Philosophy
• 5.10 Chinese Philosophy

Annotated Bibliography on Analysis: Full List of Sections

5.1 General

• Baldwin, Thomas, (ed.), 2003, The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Bambach, Charles R., 1995, Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism, Cornell University Press [ch. 1: scientism and historicism {§5.5}; ch. 2: Windelband {§5.4}; ch. 3: Rickert {§5.4}; ch. 4: Dilthey {§5.4}; ch. 5: Heidegger {§5.8}]
• Beaney, Michael, (ed.), 2007a, The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, London: Routledge [includes Beaney 2007b {§5.8, §6.1}, Reck 2007 {§6.2}, Levine 2007 {§6.2, §6.3}, Griffin 2007 {§6.3}, Hylton 2007 {§6.3}, Linsky 2007 {§6.3}, Hacker 2007 {§6.5}, Hanna 2007 {§4.5, §6.5}, Phillips 2007 {§6.5}, Baldwin 2007 {§6.7}, Beaney 2007c {§5.8, §6.1}, Lapointe 2007 {§5.3}, Moran 2007 {§5.8}, Haaparanta 2007 {§5.8}, Thomasson 2007 {§5.8}] {§1.2, §6.1}
• ––– (ed.), 2013, The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• ––– 2023, ‘Open-mindedness and Ajar-mindedness in History of Philosophy’, Metaphilosophy 54.2–3: 208–22, https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12614
• Bergson, Henri, 1903, Introduction to Metaphysics, tr. T.E. Hulme, 1912, with an introd. by T. A. Goudge, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1999; also tr. in Bergson 1946, 159–200 {Quotations}
• ––– 1946, The Creative Mind, tr. M. L. Andison, New York: Citadel Press, 1992
• Craig, Edward, 1987, The Mind of God and the Works of Man, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Davis, Brett W., (ed.), 2020, The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Forster, Michael N. and Kristin Gjesdal, (eds.), 2015, The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Ganeri, Jonardon, (ed.), 2001a, Indian Logic: A Reader, London: Routledge
• ––– (ed.), 2017, The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Gaskin, Richard, (ed.), 2001, Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy, London: Routledge [includes Simons 2001 {§5.8}, Levine 2001 {§6.3}, Candlish 2001 {§6.3}, Priest 2001 {§5.8}, {§6.1}]
• Mander, W. J., (ed.), 2014, The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press [Part I: ‘Logic and Scientific Method’]
• Misak, Cheryl, (ed.), 2008, The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Mou, Bo, (ed.), 2009, History of Chinese Philosophy, London: Routledge
• Park, Peter K. J., 2013, Africa, Asia and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780–1830, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
• Passmore, John, 1966, A Hundred Years of Philosophy, 2nd edn., London: Penguin; 1st edn. London: Duckworth, 1957 {§6.1}
• Peckhaus, Volker, 1997, Logik, Mathesis universalis und allgemeine Wissenschaft, Berlin: Akademie Verlag [chs. 5–6: algebra of logic in England and Germany]
• Tiwald, Justin, (ed.), forthcoming, The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Wood, Allen W. and Songsúk Susan Hahn, (eds.), 2012, The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

5.2 German Idealism and Romanticism

• Beiser, Frederick C., (ed.), 1993, The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [includes Burbidge 1993, Forster 1993, Hylton 1993]
• Bowie, Andrew, 1997, From Romanticism to Critical Theory, London: Routledge [ch. 4: ‘Interpretative reasons’; ch. 5: ‘The ethics of interpretation: Schleiermacher’]
• ––– 1998, ‘Introduction’ to Schleiermacher HC, vii–xxxi [xxi: Schleiermacher’s rejection of analytic/synthetic dist.]
• Breazeale, Daniel, 2013, Thinking Through the Wissenschaftslehre: Themes from Fichte’s Early Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Burbidge, John, 1981, On Hegel’s Logic, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press
• ––– 1993, ‘Hegel’s conception of logic’, in Beiser 1993, 86–101
• Craig, Edward, 1987, The Mind of God and the Works of Man, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Ezekiel, Anna, 2022, ‘Revolution and Revitalization: Karoline von Günderrode’s Political Philosophy and its Metaphysical Foundations’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30.4: 666–86 [669–73: discussion of Günderrode’s ‘The Idea of the Earth’]
• Fichte, Johann G., FGA, J. G. Fichte-Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, ed. R. Lauth et al., Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1962–
• Förster, Eckart, 2012, The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction, tr. B. Bowman, Harvard: Harvard University Press [Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Goethe, Hegel]
• Forster, Michael, 1993, ‘Hegel’s dialectical method’, in Beiser 1993, 130–70
• Forster, Michael N. and Kristin Gjesdal, (eds.), 2015, The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Goethe, Johann W., Faust [I, lines 1908–1941: Meph. vs. analysis]
• ––– 1829, ‘Analysis and Synthesis’, in The Essential Goethe, ed. Matthew Bell, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 993–5
• ––– SN, Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaft, ed. K. Lothar Wolf et al., Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger
• ––– GSS, Scientific Studies, ed. and tr. D. E. Miller, New York: Suhrkamp, 1988
• Günderrode, Karoline von, GSW, Sämtliche Werke und Ausgewählte Studien, ed. W. Morgenthaler, Frankfurt am Main: Stroemfeld Verlag
• ––– IE, ‘The Idea of the Earth’, tr. A. Ezekiel, in Nassar and Gjesdal 2021, 82–4
• Hegel, G. W. F., PS, Phenomenology of Spirit, 1807, tr. A. V. Miller, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977 [§32: analysis as destructive dissolution {Quotation}]
• ––– SL, The Science of Logic, 1812, ed. and tr. G. Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
• ––– SW, Sämtliche Werke: Jubiläumsausgabe in 20 Bänden, ed. Hermann Glockner, Stuttgart: Frommann, 1927–30 [Vol. 8, 119, 449: analysis]
• ––– HR, The Hegel Reader, ed. Stephen Houlgate, Oxford: Blackwell, 1998 [59: analysis as dissolution; 307–8: alphabetic writing vs. hieroglyphics]
• Hylton, Peter, 1993, ‘Hegel and analytic philosophy’, in Beiser 1993, 445–85
• Inwood, Michael, 1992, A Hegel Dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell [entry under ‘definition’]
• Kaufmann, Walter, 1991, Goethe, Kant, and Hegel, New Brunswick: Transaction, orig. publ. 1980 [§12: Goethe and analysis]
• Klug, Anastasia et al., (eds.), 2021, Goethe, Ritter und die Polarität: Geschichte und Kontroversen, Leiden: Mentis Verlag [Goethe on colour and polarity]
• Nassar, Dalia, 2022, ‘The Human Vocation and the Question of the Earth: Karoline von Günderrode’s Philosophy of Nature’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 104.1: 108–30
• Nassar, Dalia and Kristin Gjesdal, (eds.), 2021, Women Philosophers in the Long Nineteenth Century: The German Tradition, Oxford: Oxford University Press [translations of primary sources with informative introductions]
• Ng, Karen, 2020, Hegel’s Concept of Life: Self-Consciousness, Freedom, Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press [Hegel’s logic]
• ––– forthcoming, ‘The Idea of the Earth in Günderrode, Schelling, and Hegel’, in Kristin Gjesdal and Dalia Nassar, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Women Philosophers in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Petry, Michael John, (ed.), 1993, Hegel and Newtonianism, Dordrecht: Kluwer [includes Pozzo 1993 and Wehrle 1993]
• Pippin, Robert, 2019, Hegel’s Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in the Science of Logic, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press [Hegel’s logic]
• Pozzo, Riccardo, 1993, ‘Analysis, Synthesis and Dialectic: Hegel’s Answer to Aristotle, Newton and Kant’, in Petry 1993, 27–39 [Hegel’s dialectic as summing up traditional analysis and synthesis]
• Redding, Paul, 2023, Conceptual Harmonies: The Origins and Relevance of Hegel’s Logic, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
• Schelling, F. W. J., 1803, Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature, 2nd ed., 1st ed. 1797, tr. E. E. Harris and P. Heath, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [171–2, 187–90: analysis vs. synthesis, and the concept of matter; 258: analysis as infinite dissolution]
• Schiller, Friedrich, AE, On the Aesthetic Education of Man, 1795, rev. 1801, ed. and tr. Elizabeth M. Wilkinson and L. A. Willoughby, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967 [I 4, VI 10: vs. analysis {Quotation}; cf. 222–3]
• Schleiermacher, Friedrich, D, Dialektik, 1822, ed. R. Odebrecht, Leipzig, 1942
• ––– HC, Hermeneutics and Criticism, 1838, tr. and ed. Andrew Bowie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [includes Bowie 1998, Schleiermacher SL]
• ––– SL, ‘Schematism and Language’, from Schleiermacher, D, 370–81, tr. in Schleiermacher HC, 271–80
• Staël-Holstein, Mme. la Baronne de., 1813, ‘Kant’, in Nassar and Gjesdal 2021, 38–50
• Magee, Bryan, 1983, The Philosophy of Schopenhauer, Oxford: Oxford University Press [31–5: analysis and synthesis]
• Schopenhauer, Arthur, WWR, The World as Will and Representation, 1st edn. 1819, 2nd edn. 1844, 3rd edn. 1859, tr. E. F. J. Payne, 2 vols., New York: Dover, 1969; tr. orig. publ. 1958 [I, §§ 14–15: demonstration]
• Small, Robin, 1983, ‘Dialectic from the Analytic Point of View’, Metaphilosophy 14: 19–31 [on Hegel’s dialectic]
• Vine, Troy, 2021, ‘Goethes Newton-Kritik als interne Kritik’, in A. Klug et al. 2021 [Goethe’s critique of Newton’s account of colour]
• Wehrle, Walter E., 1993, ‘The Conflict between Newton’s Analysis of Configurations and Hegel’s Conceptual Analysis’, in Petry 1993, 17–26 [Hegelian analysis as Aristotelian rather than Newtonian]

5.3 Bernard Bolzano and the Central European Tradition

• Berg, Jan, 1962, Bolzano’s Logic, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell
• Bolzano, Bernard, 1837, Wissenschaftslehre, 4 vols., Seidel: Sulzbach [§§ 56–9: intensions; §§ 123–32: composition of props.; §§ 147, 151–5: method of substitution, relations between props.; §§ 148, 197: analyticity; §§ 554–8: defs.]
• Coffa, J. Alberto, 1991, The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [ch. 2: ‘Bolzano and the birth of semantics’] {§1.2}
• Dummett, Michael, 1997, ‘Comments on Wolfgang Künne’s Paper’, in Künne et al. 1997, 241–8; repr. in Beaney and Reck 2005, I, 154–60 [reply to Künne 1997] {§6.2}
• Kitcher, Philip, 1975, ‘Bolzano’s Ideal of Algebraic Analysis’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 6: 229–69
• Kneale, William and Kneale, Martha, 1962, The Development of Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press [365–9: Bolzano on analyticity]
• Künne, Wolfgang, 1997, ‘Propositions in Bolzano and Frege’, in Künne et al. 1997, 203–40; repr. in Beaney and Reck 2005, I, 124–53 {§6.2}
• ––– 2006, ‘Analyticity and logical truth: from Bolzano to Quine’, in Textor 2006, 184–249
• Künne, W., Siebel, M. and Textor, M., (eds.), 1997, Bolzano and Analytic Philosophy, Amsterdam: Rodopi [includes Künne 1997, Morscher 1997, Rusnock 1997, Sebestik 1997, Textor 1997]
• Lapointe, Sandra, 2002, ‘Substitution: A further conception of analysis in the early analytic and phenomenological traditions?’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 40, Supp. Vol., 101–13 [reply to Beaney 2002 {§5.8}]
• ––– 2007, ‘Bolzano’s Semantics and his Critique of the Decompositional Conception of Analysis’, in Beaney 2007a, 219–34 {§5.1}
• ––– 2011, Bolzano’s Theoretical Philosophy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan [ch. 2: decomposition; ch. 3: meaning and analysis; ch. 4: substitutional theory; ch. 5: analyticity]
• Lapointe, Sandra and Clinton Tolley, (eds.), 2014, New Anti-Kant, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan [contains tr. of Príhonsky’s New Anti-Kant (1850)]
• Morscher, Edgar, 1997, ‘Bolzano’s Method of Variation: Three Puzzles’, in Künne et al. 1997, 139–65 [analyticity]
• ––– 2018, ‘Bernard Bolzano’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/bolzano/>.
• Neeman, Ursula, 1970, ‘Analytic and Synthetic Propositions in Kant and Bolzano’, Ratio 12: 1–25
• Proust, Joelle, 1986, Questions de forme, Paris: Fayard, tr. as Questions of Form: Logic and the Analytic Proposition from Kant to Carnap by A. A. Brenner, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989 [II: Bolzano] {§1.2}
• Roski, Stefan, 2017, Bolzano’s Conception of Grounding, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann
• Rusnock, Paul, 1997, ‘Bolzano and the Traditions of Analysis’, in Künne et al. 1997, 61–85 [mathematical analysis and conceptual analysis]
• Sebestik, Jan, 1997, ‘Bolzano, Exner and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy’, in Künne et al. 1997, 33–59
• Simons, Peter, 1992, Philosophy and Logic in Central Europe from Bolzano to Tarski: Selected Essays, Dordrecht: Kluwer
• Skolimowski, Henryk, 1967, Polish Analytical Philosophy: A Survey and a Comparison with British Analytical Philosophy, London: Routledge
• Textor, Mark, 1997, ‘Bolzano’s Sententialism’, in Künne et al. 1997, 181–202 [Bolzano’s notion of paraphrase]
• Textor, Mark, (ed.), 2006, The Austrian Contribution to Analytic Philosophy, London: Routledge [includes Künne 2006, Morscher 2006 {§6.7}] {§6.1}
• ––– 2013, ‘Bolzano’s Anti-Kantianism: from A Priori Cognitions to Conceptual Truths’, in Beaney 2013, 227–49 {§6.1}
• Weiler, Gershon, 1970, Mauthner’s Critique of Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [chs. 3, 6–7: language and logic]
• Wolenski, Jan, 1989, Logic and Philosophy in the Lvov–Warsaw School, Dordrecht: Kluwer

5.4 Neo-Kantianism

• Bambach, Charles R., 1995, Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism, Cornell University Press [ch. 1: scientism and historicism; ch. 2: Windelband; ch. 3: Rickert; ch. 4: Dilthey] {§5.1}
• Beaney, Michael, 2020, ‘Two Dogmas of Analytic Historiography’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28.3: 594–614 [599–600: Windelband on justification and genesis]
• Cassirer, Ernst, 1910, Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, tr. as Substance and Function, Chicago: Open Court, 1923 [ch. 5, §2: induction and analysis]
• ––– 1913, ‘Erkenntnistheorie nebst den Grenzfragen der Logik’, Jahrbücher der Philosophie 1: 1–59 {Quotation}
• ––– 1927, ‘Das Symbolproblem und seine Stellung im System der Philosophie’, Zeitschrift für Aesthetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 21: 295–322; tr. in Luft 2015, 254–64
• Friedman, Michael, 2000, A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger, Chicago: Open Court {§5.5, §6.7}
• Gabriel, Gottfried, 1989a, ‘Lotze und die Entstehung der modernen Logik bei Frege’, introd. to Lotze L1, xi–xxxv
• ––– 1989b, ‘Objektivität: Logik und Erkenntnistheorie bei Lotze und Frege’, introd. to Lotze L3, ix–xxvii
• Glock, Hans-Johann, 1999, ‘Vorsprung durch Logik: The German Analytic Tradition’, in O’Hear 1999, 137–66 {§6.1}
• Heis, Jeremy, 2018, ‘Neo-Kantianism’, Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/neo-kantianism/>.
• Hönigswald, Richard, 1959, Analysen und Probleme: Abhandlungen zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, ed. Gerd Wolandt, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer [35–6: Plato; 69: Hobbes and nominalism; 84–6, 96–7: problem of universals solved through ‘analysis’; 203–4: analysis vs. distinction]
• ––– 1961, Abstraktion und Analysis: Ein Beitrag zur Problemgeschichte des Universalienstreites in der Philosophie des Mittelalters, ed. Karl Bärthlein, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer [opposition between analysis and abstraction in relation to the problem of universals] {§3.1}
• ––– 1969, Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Methodenlehre: I. Teil, ed. Hariolf Oberer, Bonn: H. Bouvier [152–63: definition and analysis]
• ––– 1970, Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Methodenlehre: II. Teil, ed. Hariolf Oberer, Bonn: H. Bouvier [108: abstraction vs. analysis; 206: analysis, induction and deduction; 241: analysing vs. rationalizing]
• Kinzel, Katherina, 2020, ‘Wilhelm Windelband’, Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/wilhelm-windelband/>.
• Köhnke, Klaus Christian, 1991, The Rise of Neo-Kantianism, tr. R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Lotze, Hermann, L, Logik, Leipzig, 1874, 2nd edn. 1880, Books 1 and 3 repr. as L1, Logik, Erstes Buch: Vom Denken (Reine Logik), ed. G. Gabriel, Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1989, and L3, Logik, Drittes Buch: Vom Erkennen (Methodologie), ed. G. Gabriel, Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1989 [Book 3, §§ 297–301: analytic vs. synthetic method]
• Luft, Sebastian, (ed.), 2015, The Neo-Kantian Reader, London: Routledge [contains Windelband 1883]
• Natorp, Paul, 1910, Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten Wissenschaften, Leipzig: Tuebner
• Natorp, Paul, 1912, ‘Kant und die Marburger Schule’, Kant-Studien 17: 193–221; tr. in Luft 2015, 180–97
• Rickert, Heinrich, 1892, Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis, Tübingen: Mohr, 2nd edn. 1904, 3rd edn. 1915, 5th edn. 1921
• ––– 1902, Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung, Tübingen: Mohr, 3rd edn. 1921, 5th edn. 1929, tr. by G. Oakes as The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986
• Schmied-Kowarzik, Wolfdietrich, 1969, ‘Synthesis und Analysis: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Hönigswalds Hegel-Kritik’, Hegel-Studien 5: 225–57
• Trendelenburg, A., 1867, ‘Über Leibnizes Entwurf einer allgemeinen Charakteristik’, Historische Beiträge zur Philosophie, Vol. 3, 1–47
• Windelband, Wilhelm, 1883, ‘Kritische oder genetische Methode?’, in Windelband 1915, vol. II, 99–135; tr. in Luft 2015, 271–86
• ––– 1915, Präludien. Aufsätze und Reden zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, 5th edn., Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr
• Wundt, Wilhelm, 1880, Logik, Band 1: Erkenntnisslehre, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke
• ––– 1883, Logik, Band 2: Methodenlehre, Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke

5.5 Scientific Philosophy

• Friedman, Michael, 2000, A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger, Chicago: Open Court {§5.4, §6.7}
• Hintikka, Jaakko, 2001, ‘Ernst Mach at the Crossroads of Twentieth-Century Philosophy’, in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 81–100 [Mach’s notion of reducibility to immediate experience] {§6.1}
• Holton, Gerald, 1998, The Scientific Imagination, with a new introduction, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; first published 1978 [ch. 4 (111–51): ‘Analysis and Synthesis as methodological themata’ {Quotation}]
• Mach, Ernst, 1890, ‘The Analysis of the Sensations: Antimetaphysical’, The Monist 1.1: 46–68
• ––– 1905, Erkenntnis und Irrtum, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1991 [§§ 5–11 of ‘Das Problem’, 256–64: analytic vs. synthetic method]
• ––– 1906, The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical, New York: Dover, 1959
• Pickstone, John V., 1994, ‘Museological Science? The Place of the Analytical/Comparative in Nineteenth-Century Science, Technology and Medicine’, Hist. Sci. 32: 111–38 [transition in the 19th c. from savant/connoisseur to analytical/comparative science; analysis as decomposition]
• Pojman, Paul, 2023, ‘Ernst Mach’, Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/ernst-mach/>.
• Schmaus, Warren, 1982, ‘The Concept of Analysis in Comte’s Philosophy of Mathematics’, Phil. Res. Arch. 8 [Comte on the historical succession of (ever more powerful) methods of analysis]

5.6 British Empiricism and Idealism

• Allard, James W., 2014, ‘Early Nineteenth-Century Logic’, in Mander 2014, 25–43
• Bain, Alexander, 1870, Logic, 2 vols., London: Longmans, Green, Reader, & Dyer
• ____, 1882, John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections, London: Longmans, Green, & Co.
• Basile, Pierfrancesco, 2014, ‘Bradley’s Metaphysics’, in Mander 2014, 189–208
• Beaney, Michael, 2001,‘Collingwood’s Critique of Analytic Philosophy’, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 8: 99–122
• ––– 2005, ‘Collingwood’s Conception of Presuppositional Analysis’, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 11.2: 41–114
• ––– 2006, ‘Rex Martin’s Reading of Collingwood’s Essay on Metaphysics’, Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 12.1: 83–102 [reply to Martin 1998]
• Bentham, Jeremy, WJB, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. John Bowring, Edinburgh, 1843
• ––– FO, ‘A Fragment on Ontology’, in WJB, Vol. 8, 193–211 [on fictitious entities]
• ––– EL, ‘Essay on Logic’, in WJB, Vol. 8, 213–93 [246–8: paraphrasis {Quotation}; 256–9, 275: analysis and synthesis]
• ––– C, Chrestomathia, 1815 [appendix on ‘Nomenclature and Classification’]
• Boole, George, 1847, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, London and Cambridge, repr. in Studies in Logic and Probability, ed. R. Rhees, London: Watts and Co., 1952
• ––– 1854, The Laws of Thought, London and Cambridge, repr. in Collected Logical Works, Vol. 2, London and Chicago: Open Court, 1940
• Bornet, Gérard, 1995, ‘George Boole’s Linguistic Turn and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy’, in Hintikka and Puhl 1995, 236–48 {§6.1}
• Bradley, F. H., PL, Principles of Logic, Oxford, 1883, 2nd edn. 1922, corrected impression 1928; ch. 1, §§ 1–4, 6–12, ch. 2, §§ 1–32, 38–45, 48–51, 53, 56–81, ch. 3, §§ 1–7, 12, 15–20 repr. in WLM, Part I [95 (§64): analysis as alteration {Quotation}; ch. 6: analysis; ‘Terminal Essays’, ‘A Note on Analysis’: reply to Spaulding 1912]
• ––– AR, Appearance and Reality, Oxford, 1893; 2nd edn. 1897 [425 {Quotation}]
• ––– ETR, Essays on Truth and Reality, Oxford, 1914 [176: analysis as inadequate {Quotation}; ch. 10, section ‘On analysis – its nature’; 270]
• ––– WLM, Writings on Logic and Metaphysics, ed. James W. Allard and Guy Stock, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994 [77–8 (PL, ch. 2, §64): analysis as alteration; 280 (ETR, ch. 4, 176): analysis as inadequate]
• Bradley, James, (ed.), 1996, Philosophy after F. H. Bradley, Bristol: Thoemmes Press [includes Dwyer 1996, Wilson 1996]
• Candlish, Stewart, 2001, ‘Grammar, Ontology, and Truth in Russell and Bradley’, in Gaskin 2001, 116–41 {§5.1}
• ––– 2007, The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan [ch. 5: ‘Grammar and Ontology’; ch. 6: ‘Relations’] {§6.3}
• ––– 2024, ‘Francis Herbert Bradley’, Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/bradley/>.
• Collingwood, R.G., 1933, An Essay on Philosophical Method, Oxford: Oxford University Press; rev. ed. 2005, ed. James Connelly and Giuseppina D’Oro [§3: Socratic method and Meno’s paradox {Quotation}] {§1.2}
• ––– 1940, An Essay on Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press; rev. ed. 1998, ed. Rex Martin [21–4, 39–47, 84, 219: analysis and presuppositions {Quotations}]
• Connelly, James and D’Oro, Giuseppina, 2005, ‘Editor’s Introduction’ to Collingwood 1933, rev. edn.
• Ducasse, Curt J., 1941, Philosophy as a Science, Oskar Piest [ch. 3: Collingwood] {§1.2} http://www.ditext.com/ducasse/duc-cont.html
• Dwyer, Philip, 1996, ‘Bradley, Russell and Analysis’, in J. Bradley 1996, 331–47 [Russell’s concept of analysis as decomposition taken from Bradley]
• Ferreira, Phillip, 2014, ‘Idealist Logic’, in Mander 2014, 111–32
• Godden, David, 2014, ‘Mill’s System of Logic’, in Mander 2014, 44–70
• Kitcher, Philip, 1998, ‘Mill, Mathematics, and the Naturalist Tradition’, in Skorupski 1998, 57–111
• Macleod, Christopher, 2020, ‘John Stuart Mill’, Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/mill/>.
• Mander, W. J., (ed.), 2014, The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Martin, Rex, 1998, ‘Editor’s Introduction’ to Collingwood 1940, rev. edn., xv–xcv
• McCosh, James, 1870, The Laws of Discursive Thought: being a Text-book of Formal Logic, London: Macmillan; repr. Thoemmes Press, Bristol, 1991 [§§ 62–4: analysis and synthesis; §§ 65–75: logical definition]
• McHenry, Leemon B., 1992, Whitehead and Bradley: A Comparative Analysis, State University of New York Press [ch. 3, §3 on genetic analysis]
• Mill, James, 1869, Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind, London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer
• Mill, John Stuart, SL, A System of Logic, in Collected Works, Vol. 7, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973
• Ogden, C.K., 1932, Bentham’s Theory of Fiction, London: Routledge
• Perovic, Katarina, 2024, ‘Bradley’s Regress’, Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/bradley-regress/>.
• Quine, W. V. O., 1975, ‘Five Milestones of Empiricism’, in Theories and Things, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981, 67–72 [68–70: Bentham’s paraphrasis and contextual definition {Quotation}] {§6.9}
• Sidgwick, Henry, 1895, ‘The Philosophy of Common Sense’, in Sidgwick EEM, 139–50 [discussion of Reid and critique of ‘mental chemistry’]
• ––– EEM, Essays on Ethics and Method, ed. Marcus G. Singer, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000
• Skorupski, John, 1989, John Stuart Mill, London: Routledge [chs. 4–5: deduction]
• ––– (ed.), 1998, The Cambridge Companion to Mill, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Spaulding, Edward Gleason, 1912, ‘A Defense of Analysis’, in Holt et al. 1912 [critique of Bradley] {§5.7}
• ––– 1918, The New Rationalism, New York: Henry Holt and Co. [development of Spaulding 1912] {§5.7}
• Wilson, Fred, 1990, Psychological Analysis and the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, Toronto: University of Toronto Press
• ––– 1996, ‘F. H. Bradley’s Impact on Empiricism’, in J. Bradley 1996, 251–82 [analysis and relations]
• ––– 1998, ‘Mill on Psychology and the Moral Sciences’, in Skorupski 1998, 203–54
• Wisdom, John, 1931, Interpretation and Analysis in Relation to Bentham’s Theory of Definition, London: Kegan Paul {§1.2, §6.6}

5.7 American Pragmatism

• Ambrosio, Chiara and Chris Campbell, 2017, ‘The Chemistry of Relations: Peirce, Perspicuous Representations, and Experiments with Diagrams’, in Hull and Atkins 2017, 86–106
• Atkins, Richard Kenneth, 2017, ‘Inferential Modeling of Percept Formation: Peirce’s Fourth Cotary Proposition’, in Hull and Atkins 2017, 25–39 [abductive inference]
• Burch, Robert, 2024, ‘Charles Sanders Peirce’, Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/peirce/>.
• Dipert, Randall, 2004, ‘Peirce’s Deductive Logic: Its Development, Influence, and Philosophical Significance’, in Misak 2004, 287–324
• Holt, E.B., Marvin, W.T., Montague, W.P., Perry, R.B., Pitkin, W.B. and Spaulding, E.G., (eds.), 1912, The New Realism, New York: Macmillan [includes Spaulding 1912]
• Hookway, Christopher, 1997, ‘Logical Principles and Philosophical Attitudes: Peirce’s Response to James’s Pragmatism’, in Putnam 1997
• Houser, N., Roberts, D. and van Evra, J., (eds.), 1997, Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Indiana University Press [includes Levy 1997]
• Hull, Kathleen A. and Richard Kenneth Atkins, 2017, Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic, London: Routledge
• James, William, 2014, Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Langer, Susanne K., 1957, Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Levi, Isaac, 2004, ‘Beware of Syllogism: Statistical Reasoning and Conjecturing According to Peirce’, in Misak 2004, 257–86
• Levy, Stephen H., 1997, ‘Peirce’s Theoremic/Corollarial Distinction and the Interconnections between Mathematics and Logic’, in Houser, Roberts and van Evra 1997, 85–110 [abduction; analytic/synthetic distinction]
• Misak, Cheryl, 2004, The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [includes Dipert 2004, Levi 2004, Short 2004, Wiggins 2004]
• ––– (ed.), 2008, The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Pechlivanidis, Christos A. 2017, ‘What Is Behind the Logic of Scientific Discovery? Aristotle and Charles S. Peirce on Imagination’, in Hull and Atkins 2017, 132–46
• Peirce, Charles Sanders, 1877, ‘The Fixation of Belief’, Popular Science Monthly 12 (Nov. 1877): 1–15; repr. in Peirce EP, 1, 109–23 https://cspeirce.omeka.net/items/show/2
• ––– 1878, ‘How to Make Our Ideas Clear’, Popular Science Monthly 12 (Jan. 1878): 286–302; repr. in Peirce EP, 1, 124–41 https://cspeirce.omeka.net/items/show/3
• ––– NEM, The New Elements of Mathematics, ed. Carolyn Eisele, The Hague: Mouton, 1976, 4 vols. in 5 books [IV, 1–50: theoremic/corollarial distinction]
• ––– EP, The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, 2 vols., ed. Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, Vol. 1 1992, Vol. 2 1998
• Putnam, Ruth Anna, 1997, The Cambridge Companion to William James, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Short, T. L., 2004, ‘The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Signs’, in Misak 2004, 214–40
• Spaulding, Edward Gleason, 1912, ‘A Defense of Analysis’, in Holt et al. 1912 [critique of Bradley] {§5.6}
• ––– 1918, The New Rationalism, New York: Henry Holt and Co. [development of Spaulding 1912] {§5.6}
• Wiggins, David, 2004, ‘Reflections on Inquiry and Truth Arising from Peirce’s Method for the Fixation of Belief’, in Misak 2004, 87–126

5.8 Phenomenology

• Beaney, Michael, 2002, ‘Decompositions and Transformations: Conceptions of Analysis in the Early Analytic and Phenomenological Traditions’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 40, Supp. Vol., 53–99 {§6.1}
• ––– 2007b, ‘The Analytic Turn in Twentieth-Century Philosophy’, introduction to Beaney 2007a, 1–30 {§5.1}
• ––– 2007c, ‘Conceptions of Analysis in the Early Analytic and Phenomenological Traditions: Some Comparisons and Relationships’, in Beaney 2007a, 196–216 [abridged and revised version of Beaney 2002] {§5.1}
• Bell, David, 1990, Husserl, London: Routledge [17–23: Brentano and the analysis of phenomena]
• Brentano, Franz, 1874, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, ed. L. L. McAlister, tr. A. C. Rancurello et al., London: Routledge, 1973
• ––– 1982, Deskriptive Psychologie, ed. R. M. Chisholm and W. Baumgartner, Hamburg: Meiner
• Calcagno, Antonio, (ed.), 2018, Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
• Durfee, Harold A., 1976, Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
• Elliston, Frederick A. and Peter McCormick, (eds.), 1978, Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals, University of Notre Dame Press [includes Tugendhat 1978]
• Føllesdal, Dagfinn, 2001, ‘Bolzano, Frege, and Husserl on Reference and Object’, in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 67–80 {§6.1}
• Haaparanta, Leila, 1988, ‘Analysis as the Method of Logical Discovery: Some Remarks on Frege and Husserl’, Synthese 77: 73–97
• ––– 1996, ‘The Model of Geometry in Logic and Phenomenology’, Philosophia Scientiae 1: 58–71
• ––– 2007, ‘The Method of Analysis and the Idea of Pure Philosophy in Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology’, in Beaney 2007a, 257–69 {§5.1}
• Hammond, Michael, Jane Howarth and Russell Keat, 1991, Understanding Phenomenology, Oxford: Blackwell [62–70: phenomenological description and conceptual analysis]
• Heidegger, Martin, 1927, The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, tr. A. Hofstadter, Indiana University Press, 1982 [§12, 114–15: phenomenological analysis {Quotation}]
• Husserl, Edmund, LI, Logical Investigations, 2 vols., 1st edn. 1900/01, 2nd edn. 1913, tr. J. N Findlay, rev. D. Moran, London: Routledge, 2000
• ––– IPP, Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, tr. F. Kersten, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1982 {Quotation}
• ––– EJ, Experience and Judgment, ed. L. Landgrebe, tr. J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks, London: Routledge, 1973 [§§ 22–4: explication] {Quotations}
• Küng, Guido, 1978, ‘Phenomenological Reduction as Epoche and Explication’, in Elliston and McCormick 1978, 338–49
• Manser, Anthony, 1972, ‘Phenomenology as the Method of Philosophy’, in Mays and Brown 1972, 273–80
• Mays, Wolfe and Brown, S. C., (eds.), 1972, Linguistic Analysis and Phenomenology, London: Macmillan [Part 6 on ‘Philosophical Methodology’: includes Pettit 1972a, 1972b; Tugendhat 1972; Manser 1972]
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 1945, Phenomenology of Perception, tr. D. Landes, New York: Routledge, 2012
• Moran, Dermot, 2000, Introduction to Phenomenology, London: Routledge
• ––– 2007, ‘Husserl’s Methodology of Concept Clarification’, in Beaney 2007a, 235–56 {§5.1}
• Parsons, Charles, 2001, ‘Husserl and the Linguistic Turn’, in Floyd and Shieh 2001, 123–41 {§6.1}
• Pettit, Philip, 1972a, ‘On Phenomenology as a Methodology of Philosophy’, in Mays and Brown 1972, 241–55
• ––– 1972b, ‘The Case for Explanation Continued: A Reply to Professor Tugendhat’, in Mays and Brown 1972, 267–72
• Priest, Graham, 2001, ‘Heidegger and the Grammar of Being’, in Gaskin 2001, 238–51 {§5.1}
• ––– 2002, Beyond the Limits of Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press [ch. 15: orig. publ. as Priest 2001] {§4.5, §6.5}
• Reinach, Adolf, 1969, ‘Concerning Phenomenology’, tr. Dallas Willard, The Personalist 50: 194–22
• Rosen, Stanley, 1980, The Limits of Analysis, New York: Basic Books, repr. Indiana: St. Augustine’s Press, 2000 [critique of analytic philosophy from a ‘continental’ perspective’ {Quotations}] {§1.2, §6.1}
• Ryle, Gilbert, 1932, ‘Phenomenology’, in Ryle 1971, I, 167–78 {§6.8}
• ––– 1962, ‘Phenomenology versus “The Concept of Mind”’, in Ryle 1971, I, 179–96 {§6.8}
• Simons, Peter, 2001, ‘Categories, Construction, and Congruence: Husserl’s Tactics of Meaning’, in Gaskin 2001, 54–73 {§5.1}
• Smith, David Woodruff, 2007, Husserl, London: Routledge [410–23: Husserl and analytic philosophy] {§6.1}
• Thomasson, Amie L., 2002, ‘Phenomenology and the Development of Analytic Philosophy’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 40, Supp. Vol., 115–42
• ––– 2007, ‘Conceptual Analysis in Phenomenology and Ordinary Language Philosophy’, in Beaney 2007a, 270–84 {§5.1}
• Tugendhat, Ernst, 1972, ‘Description as the Method of Philosophy: A Reply to Mr Pettit’, in Mays and Brown 1972, 256–66
• ––– 1978, ‘Phenomenology and Linguistic Analysis’, in Elliston and McCormick 1978, 325–37
• Walther, Gerda, 1922, Ein Beitrag zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaft, Halle: Max Niemeyer

5.9 Indian Philosophy

• Bhattacharyya, Sibajiban, 1987a, Doubt, Belief and Knowledge, New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research
• ––– 1987b, ‘Some Aspects of the Navya-Nyāya Theory of Inference’, ch. 17 of Bhattacharyya 1987a; repr. in Ganeri 2001a, 162–82
• ––– 1998, Language, Testimony and Meaning, New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research
• Colebrooke, Henry T., 1824, ‘The Philosophy of the Hindus: On the Nyāya and Vaiśeṣika Systems’, Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1: 92–118; repr. in Ganeri 2001a, 26–58
• Ganeri, Jonardon, (ed.), 2001a, Indian Logic: A Reader, London: Routledge
• ––– 2011, The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India 1450–1700, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• ––– (ed.), 2017, The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• ––– 2023, ‘Analytic Philosophy in Early Modern India’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/early-modern-india/>.
• Keating, Malcolm, 2019, Language, Meaning, and Use in Indian Philosophy: An Introduction to Mukula’s “Fundamentals of the Communicative Function”, London: Bloomsbury
• ––– (ed.), 2020, Controversial Reasoning in Indian Philosophy: Major Texts and Arguments on Arthāpatti, London: Bloomsbury
• Krishna, Daya, 1997a, Indian Philosophy: A New Approach, Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications
• ––– 1997b, ‘The Modes of Analysis and the Search for Precision: Developments in Navya Nyāya after Gaṅgeśa’, in Krishna 1997a, 155–62
• ––– 2001, Developments in Indian Philosophy from Eighteenth Century Onwards, New Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations
• Matilal, Bimal Krishna, 1990, Logic, Language and Reality: Indian Philosophy and Contemporary Issues, 2nd edn., Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass; 1st edn. 1985
• ––– 1998a, The Character of Logic in India, ed. Jonardon Ganeri and Heeraman Tiwari, Albany: State University of New York Press
• ––– 1998b, ‘Introducing Indian Logic’, in Matilal 1998a, pp. 1–30; repr. in Ganeri 2001a, pp. 183–215
• ––– 2001, The Word and the World: India’s Contribution to the Study of Language, New Delhi: Oxford University Press; first edn. 1990
• ––– 2005, Epistemology, Logic, and Grammar in Indian Philosophical Analysis, 2nd edn., ed. J. Ganeri, Oxford: Oxford University Press; first publ. 1971
• Matilal, Bimal Krishna and Arindam Chakrabarti, (eds.), 1994, Knowing from Words, Dordrecht: Kluwer
• Mohanty, J. N., 1992, Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought: An Essay on the Nature of Indian Philosophical Thinking, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Müller, Max, 1853, ‘On Indian Logic’, appendix to W. Thomson, An Outline of the Necessary Laws of Thought, London: Longmans, Green and Co., 3rd edn.; repr. in Ganeri 2001a, 59–74
• Perrett, Roy W., 2016, An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Radhakrishna, Sarvepalli, 1923, Indian Philosophy, 2 vols., London: George Allen and Unwin
• ––– 1937, My Search for Truth, republ. with introduction by B. K. Ahluwalia, Delhi: Newman Group, 1977
• ––– 1939, Eastern Religions and Western Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Röer, E., 1850, (ed.), Division of the Categories of the Nyāya Philosophy (Bhāṣpariccheda), tr. E. Röer, Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press
• Siderits, Mark, 1991, Indian Philosophy of Language, Dordrecht: Kluwer [ch. 3: sense/reference distinction; ch. 4: empty terms]
• Vaidya, Anand, 2020, ‘Arthāpatti: An Anglo-Indo-Analytic Attempt at Cross-Cultural Conceptual Engineering’, in Keating 2020, 311–32

5.10 Chinese Philosophy

• Beaney, Michael, 2019, ‘Developments and Debates in the Historiography of Philosophy’, in Kelly Becker and Iain Thomson, eds., The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 725–58 [753–7: Chinese philosophy]
• ––– 2021, ‘Swimming Happily in Chinese Logic’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 121.3: 355–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoab010
• ––– 2023, ‘Open-mindedness and Ajar-mindedness in History of Philosophy’, Metaphilosophy 54.2–3: 208–22, https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12614
• Beaney, Michael and Xiaolan Liang, 2023, ‘Logic, ‘logic’, ‘luójí’, and 邏輯: Zhang Shizhao and the translation of ‘logic’ into Chinese’, Journal of Chinese Philosophy 50: 298–312
• Bruya, Brian, (ed.), 2015, The Philosophical Challenge from China, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [contains Hetherington and Lai 2015]
• Chan, Wing-tsit, (ed.), 1987, A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy, Princeton: Princeton University Press
• Cheng, Chung-ying and Nicholas Bunnin, (eds.), 2002, Contemporary Chinese Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell
• Cheng, Lian, 2002, ‘Zhang Dainian: Creative Synthesis and Chinese Philosophy’, in Cheng and Bunnin 2002, 235–45
• Cua, Antonio S., (ed.), 2003, Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy, London: Routledge
• –––, 2009, ‘The emergence of the history of Chinese philosophy’, in Mou 2009, 43–68
• Fung, Yiu-ming, (ed.), 2020, Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic, Switzerland: Springer
• Fung, Yu-lan, 1948, A Short History of Chinese Philosophy, ed. and tr. Derk Bodde, New York: The Free Press
• –––, 1953, A History of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. 2: The Period of Classical Learning (From the Second Century BC to the Twentieth Century AD), tr. Derk Bodde. Princeton: Princeton University Press
• Hansen, Chad, 1992, A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Hetherington, Stephen and Karyn L. Lai, 2015, ‘Knowing-How and Knowing-To’, in Bruya 2015, 279–301
• Hu, Shi, 1919, Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy, Beijing
• ––– 1922, The Development of the Logical Method in Ancient China, Shanghai: The Oriental Book Company
• Kurtz, Joachim, 2011, The Discovery of Chinese Logic, Leiden: Brill
• Lao, Si–guang, 1982, Xin Bian Zhong Guo Zhe Xue Shi [A New Account of the History of Chinese Philosophy], 3 vols., Taipei: Sanmin
• Li, Chenyang and Franklin Perkins, (eds.), 2015, Chinese Metaphysics and its Problems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Liu, Fenrong and Jeremy Seligman, (eds.), 2015, History of Logic in China: 5 Questions, Automatic Press
• Makeham, John, (ed.), 2012, Learning to Emulate the Wise: The Genesis of Chinese Philosophy as an Academic Discipline in Twentieth-Century China, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press
• Mou, Bo, (ed.), 2001, Two Roads to Wisdom? Chinese and Analytic Philosophical Traditions, Chicago: Open Court
• ––– (ed.), 2009, History of Chinese Philosophy, London: Routledge, Part V
• Perkins, Franklin, 2016, ‘Metaphysics and Methodology in a Cross-Cultural Context’, in Tan 2016, 183–98
• Pfister, Lauren, 2002, ‘Feng Youlan’s New Principle Learning and His Histories of Chinese Philosophy’, in Cheng and Bunnin 2002, 165–87
• Suter, Rafael, 2020, ‘Logic in China and Chinese Logic: The Arrival and (Re-)Discovery of Logic in China’, in Fung 2020, 465–507
• Tan, Sor-hoon, (ed.), 2016, The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Chinese Philosophy Methodologies, London: Bloomsbury [includes Perkins 2016]
• Tiwald, Justin, (ed.), forthcoming, The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Tiwald, Justin and Bryan Van Norden, (eds.), 2014, Readings in Later Chinese Philosophy: Han Dynasty to the 20th Century, Cambridge: Hackett
• Zhang, Dainian, 2002, Key Concepts in Chinese Philosophy, tr. and ed. Edmund Ryden, New Haven: Yale University Press, orig. publ. in Chinese in 1948; rev. edn. 1989
• Zhang, Shizhao, 1910, ‘論翻譯名義 (Lùn fānyì míngyì/On the meanings of names in translation)’, Guofengbao, 1, no. 29; repr. in Zhang 2000, vol. I, 448–54
• ––– 2000, 章士釗全集 (Zhang Shizhao quanji/The complete works of Zhang Shizhao), ed. Zhang Hanzhi and Bai Ji’an, 10 vols., Shanghai: Wenhui chubanshe
• Zhou, Lianghua, 2016–17, ‘A Critical Bibliography of Russell’s Addresses and Lectures in China’, Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 36.2: 144–62
• Zhou, Lianghua with Bernard Linsky, 2018, ‘Russell’s Two Lectures in China on Mathematical Logic’, Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 38.1: 52–68